Proof patches: SPARK contracts over vendored code¶
This page is the guide to proof patches: why they exist, how the prove subcommand applies them, writing .ads and .adb patches, matching rules, worked examples, and the common pitfalls. The design (the merge engine and patched-copy pipeline) is on Architecture: verification and proof patches. Proving a project and writing SPARK contracts are on Proving and writing SPARK proofs.
Proof patches: proving vendored dependencies¶
Patch files at <target>/.adacovex/patches/ exist so vendored code you
cannot modify still counts toward the audit. Their best-known job is
overlaying docstrings for strict-mode coverage. A patch can also carry
SPARK proof aspects so vendored dependencies participate in the proof
with real contracts – without forking or touching their sources.
Why proof patches are necessary¶
Three facts force the design:
Strict mode counts vendored code. By default adacovex scans every directory except the always-excluded ones. The excluded directories are
.git,obj,tests,config, and.adacovex. A vendored dependency’s missing docstrings and missing contracts count against the target.--relaxedskips vendored dirs but drops the audit to a quick pass – not an option for a compliance assessment.gnatprove analyses a body only when the body itself opts in. (The rule from Writing proofs.) A vendored spec with no contracts contributes nothing to the proof. A vendored body without
SPARK_Modeis skipped entirely.The vendored sources are immutable. The dependency ships as-is. You cannot add contracts to it. Re-publishing a patched fork defeats the point of vendoring.
A proof patch is the merge of these three constraints. It re-declares the
vendored spec with contracts (.ads patch). It opts the vendored body into
the proof (.adb patch). The prove subcommand merges both into a patched
tree copy before running gnatprove – the originals are never touched.
How proof patches are applied¶
Count_Proof_Patchesscans<target>/.adacovex/patches/for.adsand.adbfiles. A patch carrying any ofSPARK_Mode,Pre =>,Post =>, orGlobal =>is a proof patch. A docstring-only patch never engages the proof machinery. A target with no proof patches is proved against its own tree exactly as before.Build_Patched_Copycopies the target tree (excluding.git,obj, and.adacovex) into<target>/obj/adacovex-proof/and overwrites each proof-patched source with its merged form.gnatprove runs against the copy’s root project and the resulting
gnatprove.outis copied back to<target>/obj/gnatprove/gnatprove.outfor the assessment pipeline.Patch contents are folded into the prove result-cache key, so a patch edit invalidates the cached proof and forces a re-prove (
--forcealso bypasses the cache).
The patched copy lives under the target’s obj/, so it is excluded from
scanning, manifest graphs, and the prove input hash.
Writing a spec patch (.ads)¶
A spec patch mirrors the vendored spec: same package name, same subprogram declarations (with docstrings, since strict mode requires them), plus the aspects you want gnatprove to prove:
-- .adacovex/patches/demo/deps/vt100/vt100.ads
package VT100 with SPARK_Mode => On is
-- Scroll a region of the screen up.
-- @param From Starting line of scroll region.
-- @param To Ending line of scroll region.
procedure Scroll_Screen (From : in Natural; To : in Natural)
with Pre => From <= To;
end VT100;
The merge splices the package-level aspect onto the original package declaration line and replaces each aspect-carrying subprogram declaration with the patch’s declaration block. Subprograms the patch does not re-declare with aspects are left untouched, so a patch can add a contract to one subprogram without disturbing its siblings.
Writing a body patch (.adb)¶
The spec patch declares the contracts. The body patch is what makes gnatprove actually analyse the vendored body (the body-must-opt-in rule). It lives at the body’s relative path and mirrors the body’s declarations with stub bodies that the merge ignores – the original implementation is preserved:
-- .adacovex/patches/demo/deps/vecmath/vecmath.adb
package body Vecmath with SPARK_Mode => On is
function Clamp (Value : in Integer; Lo : in Integer; Hi : in Integer)
return Integer with SPARK_Mode => On is
begin
null; -- stub: the original body's implementation is kept
end Clamp;
end Vecmath;
The merge replaces the original declaration (up to its is) with the
patch’s aspect-carrying declaration and keeps the original body proper, so
the copy gnatprove sees is package body Vecmath with SPARK_Mode => On is ... <original implementation> .... A fully SPARK-clean body needs only the
package-level aspect. The per-subprogram aspect covers bodies with a mix of
clean and I/O-bound subprograms.
Matching rules¶
The merge matches each patched declaration against the original by name and normalised parameter profile:
Matching is whitespace-insensitive. A single-line parameter list matches a multi-line one.
The default
inmode is equivalent to a bare mode (X : in IntegermatchesX : Integer).in outandoutare distinct modes.an overloaded subprogram patches its exact signature – a patched two-argument
Scroll_Screenreplaces the two-argument original, never a same-named sibling;a spec declaration terminates at its
;, a body declaration at itsis;a patched subprogram with no match in the original fails loudly (the patch is skipped and reported) rather than silently dropping the contract.
Worked example: Vecmath.Clamp¶
A vendored package whose spec and body carry no contracts:
-- demo/deps/vecmath/vecmath.ads (vendored, unmodified)
package Vecmath is
function Clamp (Value : in Integer; Lo : in Integer; Hi : in Integer)
return Integer;
end Vecmath;
-- demo/deps/vecmath/vecmath.adb (vendored, unmodified)
package body Vecmath is
function Clamp (Value : in Integer; Lo : in Integer; Hi : in Integer)
return Integer is
begin
if Value < Lo then
return Lo;
elsif Value > Hi then
return Hi;
else
return Value;
end if;
end Clamp;
end Vecmath;
The two patch files from above (spec with
Pre => Lo <= Hi, Post => Clamp'Result in Lo .. Hi, and body with
SPARK_Mode => On) merge into the copy unchanged in behaviour. gnatprove
proves the contract: 2 VCs (the Clamp postcondition and its termination
check), 0 unproved. A caller in the target’s own code can then rely on the
contract without the vendored sources ever changing.
When contracts prove – and when they are skipped¶
SPARK-clean body + body patch – gnatprove proves the patched contracts outright (the example above).
I/O-bound body (calls
Ada.Text_IO, which isSPARK_Mode Off) – gnatprove skips the I/O bodies by design and reports the unit out of proof scope. The contracts are still declared and the mechanism is exercised, but the body is not proved – and crucially, it never drags the target’s proof level down. This is the VT100 dogfood case in Ada_CRDT.
Opting a unit out of the proof (no-covex-spark-proof)¶
A unit that must not participate in the proof can opt out with a marker in
its leading comment block: no-covex-spark-proof (or no-covex-analysis
for every gate). Put the marker on the unit’s .ads spec; the body is
excluded with it.
-- no-covex-spark-proof
package Generated_Spec is
...
adacovex prove then runs gnatprove with -u plus every project unit
except the opted-out ones, so the unit’s checks never appear in the output
and never count against the proof metrics. The exclusion works for units of
the root project (those under the root .gpr’s literal Source_Dirs); when
the Source_Dirs attribute is not a plain literal list, adacovex cannot
enumerate the project safely and warns that the opt-out was not applied.
This is the escape hatch for generated or legacy units that cannot be
brought into SPARK – prefer a proof patch when the unit can be proved.
Common pitfalls¶
Spec patch without a body patch. A SPARK-clean vendored body stays out of proof scope. gnatprove reports “no checks generated” or skips the unit. Add the
.adbpatch to opt the body in.A patched declaration that does not match anything. Check the name and the parameter list (modes included) against the original. The merge reports
could not be merged ... (unmatched subprogram or oversized file)and skips the patch.Patching the wrong overload. The match is profile-aware, so a patch entry replaces exactly the signature it re-declares – verify you wrote the same parameter list as the overload you mean.
Expecting contracts to prove against a non-SPARK body.
Ada.Text_IOand otherSPARK_Mode Offdependencies cannot be analysed; the patch still applies, but the proof does not cover those bodies.